Cerebral palsy is characterized by hypoxia/reperfusion
induced damaged to the brain in the perinatal period. It is manifested in four main types: a)
Spastic, which occurs in 70-80% of cases and is associated with damage to the
corticospinal tract or the motor cortex; b) Ataxic, occurs in 10%, is
associated with damage to the cerebrum, and causes deficiencies in walks, hearing
and speech; c) Athetoid/dyskinetic is caused by injury to the to the
extrapyramidal motor system and/or pyramidal tract and to the basal ganglia, it
occurs in approximately 20% of cases. Cerebral
palsy is a non-progressive disorder in which recovery does not occur and
treatments revolve around addressing symptomology. The possibility of stem cell therapy for
cerebral palsy was proposed by Cellmedicine several years ago and is discussed
in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egRxgUXDN4Y

One type of stem cell that has been used for cerebral palsy
comes from the cord blood. Usually cord
blood stem cells are used for treatment of hematological (blood) disorders such
as leukemias or genetic metabolic conditions. Cellmedicine proposed the use of cord blood for conditions such as
cerebral palsy
because of: a) its superior growth factor producing ability to other types of
adult stem cells; b) the possibility of using cord blood with minimal matching;
and c) the ability of cord blood stem cells to directly differentiate into
other types of cells relevant to cerebral palsy such as neurons and glial

In order to test validity of the possibility that cord blood
may be useful for such a condition, the developmental cycle that occurs with
drugs has to be applied. That is,
firstly animal data needs to support the possibility of efficacy, as well as
the safety of the intervention. Secondly, pilot human studies are needed to determine if it is feasible
to administer the cells in patients with the particular disease without
possibility of adverse effects. Thirdly,
formal clinical trials need to be initiated. These usually begin with Phase I trials that assess safety and maximally
tolerated dose, Phase II trials that assess efficacy in a non-blinded manner,
and Phase III trials that seek efficacy in a
double-blind placebo-controlled manner.

Groups like Cellmedicine have been involved in treatment of
patients with cord blood. Additionally,
Dr. Joanne Kurtzburg from Duke has been using the patient’s own cord blood in
treatment of patients with cerebral palsy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLmY7Ps65wQ. Both
of these treatments were considered part of the "practice of medicine" and may
be comparable to "pilot investigations" in that safety data was generated and
the medical procedure for physically administering the cells was

Today a group at the Medical College of Georgia announced
initiation of Phase I/II Placebo-Controlled, Observer-Blinded, Crossover Study
to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Single, Autologous, Cord Blood
Stem Cell Infusion for the Treatment of Cerebral Palsy in Children.

The trial involves 40 patients between ages 2-12 who are
seizure-free and have clinical evidence
of a non-progressive motor disability due to brain dysfunction. The subjects recruited
will not have the ability to sit independently by one year of age or the
ability to walk by 18 months of age.

Patients will be
divided into 2 groups, with the first group receiving red-cell depleted, mononuclear
cell enriched cord blood unit prepared for infusion (treatment) and the second
being administered saline combined with the inert stem cell administration
solution lacking stem cells. The
observer and patient will not know who is receiving cells from which

The main observation endpoints of the trial will be safety of autologous (patient’s own)
cord blood infusion in children with cerebral palsy by repeated follow-up over
one year with clinical and laboratory evaluations. The secondary endpoint will
be determination of whether a beneficial effect has occurred in the
recipients. This will be measured using
a patient questionnaire and standardized Gross Motor Function Measure
evaluation with effects anticipated to be seen within 3-4 months.

Conceptually this study is a very safe one because it is the
patient’s own cord blood stem cells that are being used. This however could also be a negative
issue. There is some evidence that when
stem cells from another individual (allogeneic) are used, it is the reaction
between the recipient and donor that gives rise to production of numerous
growth factors. Since this current
treatment is only using the patient’s own cells, it may be similar to simply
adding your own blood back into you. The
animal studies previously performed involved using human cord blood cells in
mice lacking part of the immune system. Additionally they used much higher concentration of cord blood cells per
kilogram of body weight. Regardless, it
is very important to state that this study lays the groundwork for translation
of numerous stem cell approaches that have previously been used for patient
treatment outside of the US, for US approval.

Parents of patients interested in trial participation should
contact James E Carroll, M.D. the Principle Investigator of the study at 706-721-3371 jcarroll@mcg.edu